🔗 Share this article

When I am a DM, I traditionally avoided extensive use of randomization during my D&D adventures. I tended was for narrative flow and what happened in a game to be guided by deliberate decisions instead of random chance. Recently, I chose to change my approach, and I'm truly pleased with the outcome.

The Spark: Observing an Improvised Tool

An influential podcast showcases a DM who frequently calls for "fate rolls" from the participants. This involves selecting a type of die and outlining consequences contingent on the roll. This is fundamentally no different from rolling on a pre-generated chart, these are devised on the spot when a character's decision has no clear conclusion.

I opted to test this approach at my own game, primarily because it appeared engaging and presented a change from my usual habits. The results were remarkable, prompting me to reflect on the often-debated balance between pre-determination and spontaneity in a roleplaying game.

A Powerful Session Moment

During one session, my group had just emerged from a massive battle. When the dust settled, a player wondered if two friendly NPCs—a brother and sister—had made it. Instead of deciding myself, I handed it over to chance. I told the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. I defined the outcomes as: a low roll, both would perish; a middling roll, only one succumbed; a high roll, they survived.

Fate decreed a 4. This led to a incredibly poignant scene where the adventurers came upon the corpses of their friends, forever holding hands in their final moments. The party held a ceremony, which was uniquely powerful due to previous story developments. As a parting reward, I chose that the NPCs' bodies were suddenly restored, revealing a enchanted item. By chance, the bead's contained spell was exactly what the group needed to resolve another pressing situation. One just script such magical story beats.

Honing DM Agility

This experience caused me to question if chance and making it up are actually the core of this game. Even if you are a prep-heavy DM, your improvisation muscles may atrophy. Groups frequently take delight in derailing the most carefully laid plots. Therefore, a good DM has to be able to pivot effectively and invent details on the fly.

Employing similar mechanics is a excellent way to develop these talents without going completely outside your usual style. The trick is to apply them for minor situations that won't drastically alter the session's primary direction. As an example, I would not employ it to establish if the king's advisor is a traitor. Instead, I would consider using it to decide if the characters arrive moments before a key action takes place.

Strengthening Shared Narrative

This technique also works to keep players engaged and create the sensation that the adventure is alive, evolving based on their actions as they play. It reduces the feeling that they are merely characters in a DM's sole narrative, thereby enhancing the shared foundation of the game.

This approach has long been embedded in the core of D&D. Original D&D were filled with random tables, which suited a game focused on dungeon crawling. While current D&D tends to focuses on story and character, leading many DMs to feel they need exhaustive notes, it's not necessarily the best approach.

Finding the Healthy Equilibrium

It is perfectly no problem with thorough preparation. But, equally valid no problem with stepping back and allowing the rolls to determine certain outcomes instead of you. Control is a major aspect of a DM's role. We require it to facilitate play, yet we frequently find it hard to cede it, at times when doing so might improve the game.

A piece of suggestion is this: Have no fear of relinquishing a bit of your plan. Embrace a little randomness for minor story elements. It may create that the unexpected outcome is infinitely more rewarding than anything you would have planned by yourself.