🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents praising your advice on growing your venture? Do recruiters making contact to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the explanation might be your gender.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Dozens of women joined a collective LinkedIn experiment recently after popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they called "masculine-oriented" language - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system favors male users who use professional networking terminology.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which content are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how content are received.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not affect how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her audience decrease significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with comparable "assertive" style

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - concise and clever, but also warm and human," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after seven days, saying "Every day I continued, and results got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants encountered positive outcomes. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" described a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where the same posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to classify and spread posts based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to more content on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."